YTSEJAM Digest 6360 Today's Topics: 1) LITS FTP by "Costello, Daniel J" 2) Re: LITS FTP by wrath 3) LiTS by Barry Gilpin 4) RE: special defects by "Alexis Ramos" 5) United Nations by "Stephen Gervois" 6) Re: special defects by Mike Shetzer 7) Re:DT in the studio by Kurt Hampton 8) RE: special defects by Rick Audet 9) RE: special defects by Craig Maloney ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:38:55 -0500 From: "Costello, Daniel J" To: "'ytsejam@torchsong.com'" Subject: LITS FTP Message-ID: Hmmm... Somebody mentioned setting up an ftp server for just this list. If I can find a bootlegged copy of Bulletproof FTP, I may be able to swing something like that w/ my roadrunner account. Compared to the old LiTS, it would suck, but compared to nothing, it would be good. I don't have a domain name or anything, so you'd have to use my IP address. As long as the info didn't get out past this list, I don't think bandwidth would be that big a deal. I could probably handle about 5 people at a time. Maybe a few other people could set up something similar and we could compile a list of ytsejam ftp servers. You guys just have to promise not to hack it, since my knowledge of network security is quite lacking. :-) I'll look into it more tonight. -Dan. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:08:11 -0500 From: wrath To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Re: LITS FTP Message-ID: Costello, Daniel J wrote: > You guys just have to promise not to hack it, since my knowledge of > network > security is quite lacking. :-) I'll look into it more tonight. I guess that means you'd never find out, eh? wrath ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:31:31 -0500 From: Barry Gilpin To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: LiTS Message-ID: "would suggest someone if possible put up an FTP just for this list. I've seen it done before on other lists. The login and stuff is only for members of this list exclusively, and nobody else. That way only a handful of people need / want at a time, and they can get access to stuff that people recommend to each other." If anybody wants, I don't know if I could run an FTP, but maybe a Hotline server? I could only serve 3 or 4 shows at a time though due to hard drive space, but it would be ok if it were just for us Jammers. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:47:20 -0400 From: "Alexis Ramos" To: Subject: RE: special defects Message-ID: Special Defects does indeed kick ass. The only slight problem it has is the same problem Messhuggah has, which is that the vocals for almost all songs sound pretty much the same. But the problem here is much less noticeable than on Messhuggah's last album (only one I've heard). Special Defects is waaaay more interesting and wicked than Messhuggah's last one. By the way, which version of the cd did you get? Because the second version does not have the church organs. And I think the second version has 2 bonus songs, although the first one has some songs that were edited out on the second one. Also, the first one is, if I'm not mistaken, one whole song with no indexes, wheras the second one is indexed into songs for easier navigation. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:56:07 +0100 From: "Stephen Gervois" To: Subject: United Nations Message-ID: <000b01c280e5$438a2bf0$82defea9@cycodomain> >ilia, you forgot one thing my friend. how `bout also getting rid of the >USELESS body we call the UN. should've been done a LONG time ago, but >while we're mentioning things that need changed/revamped, that is >something that just plain needs to be disintegrated: the United Nations. Remind me Eric, where do you come from ? ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:12:07 -0500 From: Mike Shetzer To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Re: special defects Message-ID: <003501c280ef$e1276670$9b00a8c0@SHETZ> The one I got was one full song... about 49 minutes long. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexis Ramos" To: "Multiple recipients of list" Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:07 AM Subject: RE: special defects > Special Defects does indeed kick ass. The only slight problem it has is the same problem Messhuggah has, which is that the vocals for almost all songs sound pretty much the same. But the problem here is much less noticeable than on Messhuggah's last album (only one I've heard). Special Defects is waaaay more interesting and wicked than Messhuggah's last one. By the way, which version of the cd did you get? Because the second version does not have the church organs. And I think the second version has 2 bonus songs, although the first one has some songs that were edited out on the second one. Also, the first one is, if I'm not mistaken, one whole song with no indexes, wheras the second one is indexed into songs for easier navigation. > ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:13:10 GMT From: Kurt Hampton To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Re:DT in the studio Message-ID: Being that they are still on tour, I think January/Feb is a realistic time we can expect em back in, with the album maybe out in the fall/winter? They seem to be following a pattern since SFAM, with a fall release then winter/spring/summer tours. Kurt Kurt ________________________________________________________________ Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today Only $9.95 per month! Visit www.juno.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:48:39 -0500 (EST) From: Rick Audet To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: RE: special defects Message-ID: Based on your description, I believe I have the second version with bonus tracks and indexes. Any idea if "Version 3.33" means anything or is that just part of the title, printed on all versions? Rick Audet San Francisco On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Alexis Ramos wrote: (snip) > By the way, which version of the cd did you get? Because the > second version does not have the church organs. And I think the > second version has 2 bonus songs, although the first one has some > songs that were edited out on the second one. Also, the first one > is, if I'm not mistaken, one whole song with no indexes, wheras > the second one is indexed into songs for easier navigation. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:35:06 -0500 (EST) From: Craig Maloney To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: RE: special defects Message-ID: On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Rick Audet wrote: From what I've gathered, Version 3.33 is the "American" version. > > Based on your description, I believe I have the second version with > bonus tracks and indexes. Any idea if "Version 3.33" means anything or > is that just part of the title, printed on all versions? > > > Rick Audet > San Francisco > > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Alexis Ramos wrote: > > (snip) > > By the way, which version of the cd did you get? Because the > > second version does not have the church organs. And I think the > > second version has 2 bonus songs, although the first one has some > > songs that were edited out on the second one. Also, the first one > > is, if I'm not mistaken, one whole song with no indexes, wheras > > the second one is indexed into songs for easier navigation. > > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Maloney (email_address_removed) http://ic.net/~craig Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first. -- Mark Twain ------------------------------ End of YTSEJAM Digest 6360 ************************** === Contributions to ytsejam: ytsejam@torchsong.com === === Send requests to: ytsejam-request@torchsong.com === === Brought by the ghost of ytsejam@arastar.coms past === === Reach the owner of this list at: ytsejam-owner@torchsong.com ===