YTSEJAM Digest 5078 Today's Topics: 1) hardware MP3 CD player by "Sigit Prabowo" 2) CT people on the Jam... by email_address_removed 3) Re: Liquid Tension Experiment 2CD bootleg new for $30!!!!!!! by Andreas Skarin 4) Re: MP3 player that plays CDs etc. by Michael Burstin 5) Rudess by email_address_removed 6) Mp3 at 128kbps by "Chris Mine" 7) Triple Sales by "Toni" 8) It's the medium, dummy by Joseph Bissonnette 9) Of KUPD, The Latest Albums on My Hot List, and Rambling--An by Wes Foll 10) Maiden on the radio by Dale R Newberry 11) more on MP3s... by "xxx" 12) Re: YTSEJAM digest 5077 by "Guido Mercati" 13) unsubcribe by "Lee Price" 14) bassists by "Trevor W. Hoit" 15) Ayreon by Graham Borland 16) MP3's by "Al @ Switchcraft" 17) EARN EXTRA INCOME NOW! by "Gregory" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 08:06:10 +0700 From: "Sigit Prabowo" To: Subject: hardware MP3 CD player Message-ID: <000701bf055f$d4484000$0cca17ac@sigitprabowo> First of it's kind, aint it? > > http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1006-200-114511.html?tag=st.ne.1002.tgif?st.ne > actually, in Indonesia we already have at least two types of 'em available in stores : - Philips 888 GSVM - Sanken SVP 700 (Indonesian brand) both can play audio CDs, MP3 CDs, and Video CDs. it's very cheap too, about Rp 1.3 million (USD 1 = Rp 7500) ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 21:41:03 -0400 From: email_address_removed To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: CT people on the Jam... Message-ID: well i am in Connecticut, and this morning i was listening to 95.1 FM in my car (normally not a fan of radio but its a mostly classic rock station, lots of old rush and yes and other cool sh*t when i turn it on) and they did something they called the "Rolling Rock Rock Report" - basically news clips about music stuff - like new inductees to the Rock N Roll hall of fame, et cetera..... and when the dude started speaking, the intro music was part of LINES IN THE SAND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i know some of you are very anti-DT-going-mainstream, and no, FII was *not* my fave album (I&W thank you) by any stretch - but i think it is absolutely awesome that even for a few seconds they're getting unsolicited airtime that they totally deserve.. like when MTV used to use that piece by megadeth for MTV news, back in the day when they really were a music channel. ........ LOLOL i am really showing my age on that one, eh? = ) brightened my day, hope someone else liked my story = ) peace Nicole NP: "Monster Ballads," Fantomas, and "Album of the Year" by Faith No More **create happiness** ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 03:43:30 +0200 From: Andreas Skarin To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Re: Liquid Tension Experiment 2CD bootleg new for $30!!!!!!! Message-ID: I'm sorry guys! That last post was really for NuGgeTMaN. -- Andreas Skarin Swedish Dream Theater Society http://sdts.cjb.net - mailto:email_address_removed.se ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 21:50:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Burstin To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Re: MP3 player that plays CDs etc. Message-ID: > Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 16:31:03 -0700 (PDT) > From: Trent > Subject: Re: MP3 player that plays CDs etc. > Message-ID: > > > Now, when DVD audio comes around, they will really blow this sort > > of player out of the water (although imagine a DVD-r full of MP3s, > > that like thousands of hours of music -- an entire CD collection > > could be stored on 1 or 2 disks...) > > I dunno man, DVD audio will supposedly be "secure" as opposed to > current standards. I would guess it will be, as are standard vidoe DVDs... As it stands today, you can't do digital out from a DVD player on a track w/ 96 (as opposed to standard 48khz) sampling rate... for some sort of reproduction reason... (or something like that... forget the exact specifics, but somethign that the players won;t allow digital out, only analog out) > Your "several thousand hours of music" theory would be true if not > for the digital watermarking technology. I was talking more about taking MP3s that you make yourself, and then burn using a DVD-R drive... not somethign downloaded... -- +--------------------------------+-------------------------------+ | In the stream of consciousness | Lines In The Sand, taken from | | There is a river crying | Dream Theater's | | Living comes much easier | Falling Into Infinity | | Once we admit We're dying | | +--------------------------------+-------------------------------+ Michael Burstin: email_address_removed http://www.cs.brandeis.edu/~mikeb/ Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email: http://www.cauce.org ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 20:42:53 EDT From: email_address_removed To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Rudess Message-ID: Hey id lie some info on that Rudess Exp. you are talking about??? were can I get my hands on something like that?? Just ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 22:46:35 -0400 From: "Chris Mine" To: Subject: Mp3 at 128kbps Message-ID: <001c01bf056d$da4e4540$message_id_removed> you are crazy...128kbps Mp3's sound like crap (worse than a cassette)! I have burned a few CD's with them, and i can not stand to listen to it...i gave them all away. It sounds like the high end is in a washing machine. I have heard many different encoders and they all sound bad. There is a noticable improvement at 192kbps, but it does not sound as good as the original wav file. i'd take the blindfold test any day. I think the real test is going to be the 16bit CD vs a 24/96 DVD audio...i want to hear that, i would be surprised if you can't...but i don't know since i have yet to hear one. Chris > As for those of you who say that it's a step backwards, and that you can > notice a difference between a 160kbps MP3 and a CD, I would love to put you > to the test sometime, because I really do have to doubt you. Maybe the > encoders or the players you're using suck, or something in the AD / DA is > fuxored, but I;d go so far as to say that most of the people on this list > probably couldn't tell a 128kbps MP3 from a cd. The human ear makes a lot > of generalizations. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 22:42:55 -0500 From: "Toni" To: 3times20e Subject: Triple Sales Message-ID: *** URGENT *** ACCEPT CREDIT CARDS =46OR YOUR BUSINESS AND INCREASE YOUR PRO=46ITS 30%-50% ! INTERNET STORE=46RONT HOMEBASED OR MAIL ORDER BUSINESSES WE SPECIALIZE IN HELPING THE SMALL BUSINESS OWNER! I=46 YOU CALL IN THE NEXT =46IVE DAYS YOU WILL RECEIVE: NO APPLICATION =46EE NO PROGRAMMING =46EE AND YOUR =46IRST AND LAST MONTH LEASE PAYMENT IS =46REE YOU CAN GET STARTED =46OR ONLY $9.95 !!! DON'T =46ORGET TO ASK ABOUT OUR WEB HOSTING AND DESIGN PACKAGE= !!! CALL (888) 264-9272 OUR HOURS O=46 BUSINESS ARE 9AM - 6PM MST ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// / Please remove at mailto:vicv@mail.md?subject=3Dremove //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////= ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 22:21:48 -0500 From: Joseph Bissonnette To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: It's the medium, dummy Message-ID: >From: "Christopher W. Ptacek" > >probably couldn't tell a 128kbps MP3 from a cd. The human ear makes a lot >of generalizations. Precisely. The ptacek knows all . Audiophiles will always be audiophiles, and will be able to hear the difference between a cd running on system with 1/4" thick speaker cables and one with 5/16" speaker cables. But for the rest of us a well recorded mp3 at a decent bitrate doesn't sound bad at all. But that's beside the point. The sound quality is not the reason for the hubbub with mp3. Or at least not the primary reason. Here is the reason: Near CD quality sound at a size small enough to be efficiently trasmitted over the internet. Everyone get that? How many songs you can fit on a CD with mp3 is nice and all, but it's their ability to be easily uploaded and downloaded (except for people with .4 kb/s transfer rates) that has caused all the uproar. It completely upends the music distribution system that has been in place since the dawn of commercial music. Whether or not it sounds as good as or better than CD's is not the point. New formats will come around with better compression algorithms, or increases in bandwidth will allow less compression to be used, or (more likely) both. At some point the music being transfered over the internet will sound better than cd's. Another key point with mp3's is that it is the first significant move of making music into software. Within 5 years any new stereo you buy will be able to communicate with your computer(s) over a home network, be it wireless, over cable-TV lines, or (my bet) through the house's power lines. So you could warehouse your music collection on your computer and be able to instantly access any piece of music, or playlist, or whatever from any stereo in your house. Eventually once bandwidth grows enough you will be able to access your music collection from anywhere on the earth. Hell, you probably won't own a collection persay, just a list of songs with access keys stating that you own the rights to listen to them that will allow you to play the songs from the server of the musicians' record company. In any case the deal with mp3's is not that they're supposed to be the greatest format there has ever been, or that they sound better than cd's, but that it's the first step in a series of changes that will revolutionize the way we listen to music. >From: CyberDuke > >The only thing I care about is: I hope the whatever-later technology >comes, let it be compatibile for mp3s too, so that I can play my ancient >1999 collections of MP3s! :) I'm chopping my head off right now if I'm >doing all this mp3 crap in vain, if I can't listen them some 10, 20 >years later! :) Really. > That's the beauty of software, the mp3 player you have on your harddrive right now is never going to stop functioning (well it could if it's nag-ware or something, but probably not). Whatever the new trend is, you'll still be able to play mp3's. And it's a good bet that whatever new format arises there will be free utilities released that will allow you to convert mp3's to the new format. >From: Trent > >Ah yes. This, my friend, is why you need to invest in >a higher band width connection. Cable modems or DSL >are excellent choices. I would pay $.2 for T1 b/c the >whole idea is impractical for long term use and for >home users. > Give him a break, he's from siberia or somewhere, it'll take a few decades before they get cable and DSL. (jk about siberia =) Here in middle America we just got access to both this summer. Poor Europeans will likely still have a while to wait. >From: Trent >I dunno man, DVD audio will supposedly be "secure" as >opposed to current standards. Your "several thousand >hours of music" theory would be true if not for the >digital watermarking technology. I hate the fucking >record biz for forcing this shit down our throats. Depends on what you're refering to. You could still get thousands of hours of music on a DVD, just not in DVD Audio format. While DVD Audio will be watermarked (as will be DVD Audio players) that's somewhat beside the point at DVD Audio will take up shitloads of room with its higher definition and more channels. If you just want to burn mp3's onto a DVD you will indeed be able to get hundreds, if not thousands, of hours on one disc. >2-bit. No comparison need be made. You audiophiles >would be in Hog Heaven if this should ever come to >pass (and forgive me for saying that I hope it doesn't >as it will basically wipe out this underground mp3 movement). As I mentioned, DVD Audio will have massive sound files. MP3, or any compressed sound format, is in no more danger from it that it is from wav files. They're just too big to be practical for transfer over the internet. At least until we all have fiber optics running directly to our desks. I'd be more concerned about the SDMI sound format. Yours in mp3's, Biz ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 21:38:10 -0700 From: Wes Foll To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Of KUPD, The Latest Albums on My Hot List, and Rambling--An Message-ID: >From: David Dixon >Yes, KUPD (97.9 in the Phoenix area) kicks ass - they play everything from >Rush (heard "Limelight" this morning) to Pantera to Metallica, plus >Zeppelin, Sabbath, and Queen. I've heard Symphony X's "Out of the Ashes" on >more than one occasion on their Sunday night show, "Into the Pit". Wow. I didn't know they were so cool as to play some prog metal too, ESPECIALLY Symphony X. That's too cool. My wife Catherine has some cousins in Phoenix, so we do the four hour road trip out to Phoenix (Tempe to be exact) a lot. The both of us now exclusively listen to that station pretty much the whole way into Arizona--which, if anybody else here is familiar with the state, is a VERY lonely drive through the desert until you get to Phoenix. It's nice to know at least one station in America still has some guts. And you know what? That station is HUGELY popular, one of their morning djs (forget the name) has like, 20-something percent of the total listening population at the time he is on. That is supposedly an unbelievably high percentage of people listening. This is according to my wife's brother who is a dj up in Washington state. He's heard of the guy through trade publications and stuff. >nothing else. Last Sunday it was "cover night", and they played Type O's >"Day Tripper Medley", which was a cool preview to the new album (which also >KICKS ASS, BTW)... :) What band originally did that song? I wasn't aware it was a cover. I've had the album for about a month now, and I TOTALLY agree, you MUST pick this one up if you happen to stumble upon an extra $20 bill someplace! It's been on constant rotation in my cd player (and on my Ytseradio shift on Thursday nights 7-9 pm Pacific time<---shameless plug!!). It's great that KUPD is playing new TON. I heard them promoting the release of the album about a month ago, giving the release date and talking a bit about it. Also, since it is my opinion that this list desperately NEEDS some new conversation lately to tide us over, I would like to mention another great album that is out (IMO) and that is getting regular rotation on my "NOW PLAYING" lists: Machine Head's new one titled "The Burning Red." Although it's a *little* different in the feel of the music than their previous two kick-ass releases, it still measures up to my scrutinizing ear for kick-ass metal. It's a very emotionally-charged album, with heaviness up the wazoo. It still has that classic sound in the guitars that Rob Flynn does--you know, that "dee daw dooo" high note stuff that he sticks in the middle of the riffs? The only real difference I noticed is that it is not _quite_ as complex as the other two, which brings it down one notch on my scale from a Perfect 10 to a 9. But that is easily overlooked IMO hehe. Another great album that needs to be discussed is Meshuggah's Chaosphere album. IT FUCKING RIPS! If you want to know what the future of great heavy music is going to sound like (read: what other bands will be trying to copy, and most will be miserably failing at), you HAVTA listen to Meshuggah! Also, another must-have of this band's is Destroy, Erase, Improve. Well, I'm done rambling for now, The music is out there. . . ------------------------------------------------------ I wonder how much deeper the oceans would be without sponges. Wesley Foll, Geology B.S., Loma Linda University http://www.redrival.com/wesfoll/main.html email_address_removed email_address_removed email_address_removed ICQ #4550740 ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:00:29 -0500 From: Dale R Newberry To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Maiden on the radio Message-ID: Wow, someone actually responded to a post of mine :). Anyway, that station in Phoenix, is it the same one that sponsored the Megadeth/Misfits/Nixons (ugh)/Gravity Kills (ugh) show a couple years ago? Great show (well, the Misfits and 'Deth anyway)? It is great to hear that some stations are playing some killer music. I believe the trend (a good one, for once) is finally hitting the midwest a little bit. Let's just hope this keeps up some, and maybe the new DT will get some play. By the way, I did also hear Twisted Sister's "I Wanna Rock" and Priest's "Breakin' the Law" that same night :). I also just heard Crue's "Looks that Kill" (okay, so it's not ALL great :). In other news, I just scored Amporphis' latest album (Tuonela) for $1.99 earlier today. Great great stuff (on first listen, anyway). Dale R. Newberry ___________________________________________________________________ Get the Internet just the way you want it. Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month! Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 09:02:49 +0300 From: "xxx" To: "Ytsejam" Subject: more on MP3s... Message-ID: <000501bf0589$45ad31a0$b00344c1@xxx> CyberSuke wrote: >P.S. I bet my son will roll on the floor laughing when I tell him how >his dad used to download mp3s with 0.4 KB/s transfer, for hours and >hours, ... all those phone bills and unslept nights. Talking about >wasted time... LOL! /me wonders why this sounds so familiar to him As long as the MP3 discussion goes, I have 128 kbit mp3s encoded with the XING algorithm, which are with significantly worse sound with the Fraughoffer (sp?) algorhithm encoded ones, i.e. with l3enc, mp3 producer or mp3 compressor. Besides that a 256 kbit mp3 encoded with mp3 compressor IS with cd quality. VQFs maybe are better, but it's not the first time in the music industry when a better product gets overridden by a product with mediocre quality but supported by a massive advertising campain. Vic ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 08:19:41 +0200 From: "Guido Mercati" To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Re: YTSEJAM digest 5077 Message-ID: >To anyone who even considered this completely obsurd offer...just go= download >it from Lines in the Sand (forgot the url...something like >http://www.dreamtheater.mit.edu) FOR FREE, or E-mail me and I'll hook you= up >with it for the mere cost of 2 blank CD's ($4?). People like this guy= REALLY >piss me off! You make the call, $4 or $30 for the same show...not to= mention >mine is digitally remastered so it probably sounds better too. > >P.S. this is not to advertise myself, merely to keep people from getting >ROBBED!!! > >Guido Mercati wrote: > >> Great double cd LIVE containing songs from the LTE Live Show in=3D >> Philadelphia 01/22/99. >> The audio quality is really good and the track list is: >> CD1: Osmosis/Paradigm Shift/Kindred Spirits/Another Dimension/State= of=3D >> Grace/Freedom of speech >> CD2: Biaxident/Mike & Tony/Chris & Kevin's Excellent adventure/JAm= session=3D >> / Universal mind/Acid RAin Great cover art >> >> Tell me ASAP,I've got many people who ask for it!!! FIRST OF ALL MY CDs ARE SERIGRAPH CDs BY D.O.S. RECORDS (JAPAN). COOL= ARTWORK W/ COLOUR (NOT PHOTOCOPIES) AND COOL SOUNDS. IF YOU WANT A= CD-R...OK...BUT I LOVE "M"usic AND I PREFER TO HAVE GOT IN MY COLLECTION A= GREAT CD LIKE THAT. >I burned a copy of the Philly boot about 4 months ago from Bogie's site,= and >yeah, you don't get the cool artwork unless you go to another site,= download >it, print it out, and stick it in the CD. Damn. Free CDs. With liner >notes. Sorry dude, that's a NEGATIVE on the 30 bones. > >Let's play *catch the movie reference*, shall we? Name the loose tie-in: >"People who sell bootlegs ought to shampoo my crotch." :) SAME AS ABOVE. TRY TO BE SERIOUS SOMETIMES...MY 2CDs ARE REAL CDs!!!! NOT= SILLY CD-R Guido Mercati Guitar Chef Crew http://auditorium.it.fortunecity.com/strumento/4 ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 01:41:48 PDT From: "Lee Price" To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: unsubcribe Message-ID: ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 01:49:48 -0700 From: "Trevor W. Hoit" To: "'ytsejam@torchsong.com'" Subject: bassists Message-ID: > -----Original Message----- > Oh, and Racer X is back, working on a new album, with the ORIGINAL LINEUP! > Great news for you bassists and fellow guitarists out there, eh? > http://www.paulgilbert.com/paulgilbert/news.html > Speaking of bassists, are Bobby Sheehan (recently deceased bassists of Blues Traveler) and Billy Sheehan related? ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 10:40:55 +0100 From: Graham Borland To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Ayreon Message-ID: ReSent-From: Graham Borland ReSent-To: ytsejam@torchsong.com According to the web site at http://www.ayreon.com/ Russell Allen of Symphony X has been confirmed as one of the vocalists on the forthcoming Ayreon album, along with Neal Morse of Spock's Beard, Bruce Dickinson of Iron Maiden, and others I've never heard of. I really enjoyed the last one, Into The Electric Castle, which was blessed with the talents of Anneke van Giersbergen and Sharon den Adel, but the new line-up appears to have a distressing lack of women. God forbid I should start having negative preconceptions about an album which is still such a long way away, and about which I know very little, but it could turn out to be a bit one-sided and unbalanced. Even so, with three of my favourite singers, I'll probably still love it. If only James LaBrie were on it as well . . . -- _______________________ ___________________________ |o o| |o o| | Graham Borland |:: | Picsel Technologies Ltd |:: | email_address_removed |:: | Glasgow, Scotland |:: |_______________________|:: |___________________________|:: ::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 05:15:07 -0500 From: "Al @ Switchcraft" To: retaehT maerD Subject: MP3's Message-ID: Andy Putman wrote: >Perhaps I'm just an audiophile, but I can hear a very significant different >between cd's and mp3's. I like mp3's for hearing new artists and bands, but >if I'm actually gonna listen to music seriously, I just won't settle for >them. I'd just rather have beautiful sound and switch cd's. > -Andy Thank you for bringing that up. I pondered shedding some light on that fact. After some thought, I elected to keep my mouth shut for fear of starting another flame war. (We have been touchy lately) MP3's are great for just what you said: "hearing new artists and bands." Beyond that, *I* don't find them pleasant at all for regular listening. They are dirty and grainy sounding. But hey, they beat the hell out of RA files for previewing material. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brian Hansen wrote: >hmmm...Does DT have all of their recordings on a >analog source somewhere? I would assume the original studio masters were analog. I could be wrong. Mike? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CyberDuke wrote: >About the quality thang: I think, ... no, no, I KNOW that 128kbps MP3 >has drastic worse sound quality than a CD, but do it at 256 kbps and you >have ummmmm ... the original quality! :) Not a chance, even at 256k. And at the expense of twice the file size. Your statement: "Original quality" is highly dependent on the playback gear. Your playback gear will be processing data that has had some of the original information striped away in the interest of minimizing bandwidth. This CAN'T maintain the "Original quality." The CD audio format is STILL inferior to analog; MP3's are inferior CDs. These are FACTS that can't be ignored. Once we do, we really will be making giant leaps backwards. Don't accept mediocrity, that's a sure fire way of guaranteeing that's the best the future will offer... There is no way to sugar coat this... I hope you don't take this as a flame. -- Al - The Ytse-ProGtologist ^ Switchcraft Microsystems ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ When you live in the land of 10,000 lakes, it's nice to know that all men are created equal in cold water. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 06:18:18 -0500 From: "Gregory" To: more90j@bluewin.ch Subject: EARN EXTRA INCOME NOW! Message-ID: Hello! I know that a lot of people wish they could stay at home and make thousands of dollars. Well...here is the program to do just that! You may have seen the feature story about this program on a major network TV show several months ago. The network TV show determined that the program explained below is a service and is 100% legal. Take a few minutes to read over all of the information enclosed, MAKE A COPY, then read it again. You won't be sorry! Good Luck! ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Like a lot of people, I was looking for additional income by replying to various advertisements on the Internet and in newspapers. Having worked most of my adult life in the financial profession, I was very impressed by the following proposal: A few weeks ago I received a letter from a fellow attorney that said:=94I am a retired attorney and about two years ago a man came to me with a letter.=94 The letter he brought to me is the same letter you have before you now. He asked me to review its contents to determine if the letter was legal. I told him I would look it over and get back to him with my opinion. When I first read the letter I thought it was an "off the wall" idea to make money. A week later, I met with my client to discuss the issue. I told him the letter as originally given to me was not 100% legal. Naturally, I was curious about the letter, so he told me how it worked. After hearing the explanation, I decided it was a "long shot", so I decided against participating. However, before my client left my office, I asked him to keep me updated as to his results. About two months later, he called to tell me that he had received more than $800,000 in cash!! Well, I didn't believe him, of course, so he asked me to try the plan and see for myself. I thought about it for a few days and decided that there was not much to lose. I followed the instructions exactly and mailed out 200 letters. Sure enough...the money started coming in! It came slowly at first, but after three weeks, I was getting more mail than I could open in a day. After about 13 weeks, the money stopped coming. I kept a precise record of my earnings and at the end it totaled $868,439.00! I earn a good living as an attorney, but as anyone in the legal profession will tell you, there's a lot of stress that comes with the territory. I decided if things worked out, I would retire from my practice and play golf. This time I sent out 500 letters. Well...a little more than three months later, I totaled $2,344,178.00!! I met my old client for lunch to find out exactly how it works. He told me that there were a few similar letters going around. What made this one different is the fact that there are seven names on the letter...not five like the others. That factor alone resulted in more returns. The other factor was the advice I gave him in making certain the whole thing was perfectly legal, since no one wants to risk doing anything illegal. I know you must be curious about the little changes I advised him to make for the letter to be legal. Well, when sending out a letter like this one, to be legal, you must sell something if you expect to receive something in return. So, when you send a dollar to each of the seven names on the list, you MUST include a slip of paper saying: "PLEASE ADD ME TO YOUR MAILING LIST" and include YOUR NAME, MAILING ADDRESS, AND E-MAIL ADDRESS. This is the key to the program. The item you will receive is THIS LETTER and the right to earn thousands. =46ollow the simple instructions EXACTLY, and in about three months, you should receive MORE THAN $800,000 IN COLD, HARD CASH!!! 1) IMMEDIATELY send $1.00 to each of the seven names listed below. The SOONER you send the "$1.00 LETTERS", the SOONER you will start getting a return! Wrap the dollar in a note saying: "Please add me to your mailing list". Include YOUR NAME, MAILING ADDRESS, AND E-MAIL ADDRESS. You will receive expert tips on promoting this letter and some excellent BULK EMAIL resources. *Remember...If you don't ask for this service, use of this letter will be illegal for you! 1) A. Colon,PO Box 290,Bronx,NY 10463 2) T.=46rank,N78W 14573 Appleton Ave.,#227,Menomonee =46alls,WI 53051= 3) J. Russell,5201 Kingston Pk.,#6-315,Knoxville,TN 37919 4) E-2000 Marketing, PO Box 15185, East Providence, RI 02915 5) Warbird, PO Box 7553, Newport Beach, CA 92658 6) J. Jones, PO Box 8869, Columbia, SC 29202 7) C. Zack, 300 N 18th St., Phoenix, AZ 85006 NAME & ADDRESS NEXT TO #1. at the top of the list and MOVE the other names(#2 thru #7) UP ONE POSITION. Then place YOUR NAME & ADDRESS in the #7 spot. Be careful when you type the addresses. It is suggested that you PROO=46READ to MAKE CERTAIN the names and addresses are correct. 3) When you have completed the above instructions, you may market the letter using the following options: 1. Bulk email 2. U.S. Postal Service 3. =46lyers 4. Post =46REE Classified Ads on the Internet 5. Newsgroups This letter has been proven perfectly legal for all of the above means, as long as you follow the instructions; because you are purchasing membership in an exclusive mailing list. To mail this letter out over the Internet, you can browse through ours and find people to send it to. All you have to do is cut and paste e-mail addresses wherever you are on the Internet. Another method of marketing the letter is using a Bulk E-Mail Service to mail out letters in large volume for you. We suggest using the Bulk E-Mail approach. When you mail your $1 letters you will receive a few recommendations for bulk email companies that will supply you with fresh email addresses. Posting =46REE CLASSI=46IED ADS on the Internet can also achieve results. Simply go to a search engine(e.g. Yahoo, Hot Bot, Lycos, Excite, Infoseek, etc. and type in =46REE CLASSI=46IED ADS. You'll get a list of over 80,000 sites where you can post ads. Remember to use a catchy title like =46REE MONEY, and post your e-mail address. When you get an inquiry, simply e-mail a copy of this letter. The more you send, the more you will make. It's a lot of work...so that's why we recommend using a Bulk E-mail Service. We strongly encourage you to mail this letter to your family and friends. They'll be grateful!! THIS IS A SERVICE AND IS 100% LEGAL. You may refer to: Title 18, Section 1302 & 1342 of the U.S. Postal & Lottery Statute; or check it out with the U.S. Postal Service if you have questions. Let's assume, for example, you get a 7.5% return rate. My first attempt, however, was 9.5%, and my second was more than 11%. 1) When you send out 200 letters, 15 people send you $1.00 ($15.00) 2) Those 15 people mail out 200 letters and 225 people send you $1.00 ($225.00) 3) Those 225 people mail out 200 letters and 3,375 people send you $1.00 ($3,375.00) 4) Those 3,375 people mail out 200 letters, and 50,625 people send you $1.00($50,625.00) 5) Those 50,625 people mail out 200 letters, and 759,375 people send you $1.00 ($759,375.00) 6) At this level, your name drops off the list. Think about it. Look at what you will have received before your name drops off the list. It looks unbelievable, I know. Do the math...see for yourself! Just DO IT and you'll happily believe because you'll receive proof in the form of MANY ONE-DOLLAR BILLS!!! Just make certain that you send a dollar to each of the seven names on the list; including the note asking to be added to their mailing list. Together we will all prosper! Well...you've read this far, so let me ask you a question: Q: What do you have to lose? A: Only $7.00 Don't throw this letter away. Keep it...think about it...and after awhile...YOU WILL TRY IT! I looked at it for over two months, and then I said: "It's only $7...I have to be nuts not to do it". ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // Reomve at: mailto:email_address_removed?subject=3Dremove ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // ------------------------------ End of YTSEJAM Digest 5078 **************************